The study of the skull as a treatable subject has been the subject of controversy for many years. Cotton, Fry, and Soserland were among the first practitioners who suggested that the skeletal bones of the skull could be manipulated to invoke, and were responsible for many of the symptoms of humanity if they were in defeat. Theories about the function of the cranial vault vary from the concept that the skull is a solid, immovable object that, after ossification, cannot move inside and cannot manipulate those who regard the skull as a dynamic structure that supports mobility throughout life.
Proponents of cranial manipulation suggest that some manual contacts taken on the surface of the skull with directed thoughts and / or pressure can influence and change the position and function of the bones of the skull, which will affect the inner workings of the nervous system and the flow of cerebral spinal fluid into the brain and spinal cord. and around it. The general opinion is that cranial “adjustments” can somehow alter the tension of the meningeal dural system when it passes from the inner parts of the cranial vault to the sacrum, which can change and correct the aberrations in the cerebral spinal fluid flow. It is said that this is a positive response for the patient in the form of improving health and reducing a multitude of symptoms.
Research is continuing on the effectiveness of skull manipulation as a viable method for treating a wide range of human diseases. Clinical evidence suggests that cranial manipulations have advantages for a large number of patients with conditions such as headaches, sinusitis, tinnitus, dizziness, and even epilepsy.
My many patients, who in many cases could not resist the cranial adjustment, inspired this text. While I was in the midst of a concentration of intentions, holding cranial contact and expecting to feel a “release”, which indicates that the correction was completed and the movement was restored in the skull, my patients often turned or tilted their heads so that change my perception. I began to understand that the specific movements made by the patient contributed to the expansion and release of the area of the cranial joints, on which I worked.
I began to experiment with the main engines of lateral flexion and rotation, holding various cranial contacts. I found that in many cases, decompression of a stuck or fixed area was faster and more complete than implemented only in passive motion. I also found that if the patient’s movement was too fast or strong, then the navigator’s system would block and the technique would fail. It became apparent that the balance between the force applied by the practitioner and the force of motion controlled by the patient should even be distributed to obtain the desired result.
The difficulty of finding a harmonious combination of the patient’s efforts and the doctor’s opposition is compounded by the patient’s inability to understand the direction the doctor was trying to reach. This became particularly problematic when combined movements were requested. Sometimes it was necessary to demonstrate to the patient the desired movement, moving his head with his right hand with his hands or showing, apparently, with his movement of the head.
Sometimes I developed a system that allowed me to coordinate the direction and intensity of the motives of the subject in order to create the desired effect. I began using the patient's skull with the patient to focus them on the concept of flexion, stretching, rotation and lateral flexion. I found it easier to tell the patient: “Lift the chin,” “lift the chin” and “turn your head to the left or right” and “bend to the left or the right.” Apparently, it was necessary to move the patient's head in the right direction until they begin to understand the directions. Most patients were able to understand the concepts of a particular movement and were able to understand the concept of combined movement with relative ease.
The quality of movement is just as important as the direction of movement when applying the isocranial component to the cranial correction. Muscle contraction should be very slow and in the right direction to facilitate the release from the joints. If the patient squeezes the muscles too hard or too quickly, the doctor cannot maintain proper contact with the skull and will slip off the contact point. If the doctor increases the pressure to maintain contact, the cranial reaction will be fixation, and the movement will not be achieved, the patient will not respond, and the lesion may appear to be aggravated by treatment. The patient is always given instructions with a low level of relaxation.
The first team of the doctor before the patient is to say: “I want you to move very slowly and gently,” and then he gives the necessary direction of movement. The slower and softer the patient applies the contract of muscles, the easier it is for the doctor to perceive changes in cranial stress. The physician may also inform the patient to terminate or terminate the contract at the time when the suture begins to be released. He also tells the patient to keep and maintain the contract at a certain point or level, which, in his opinion, is the achievement of the desired result. The doctor may feel the need to stop the resistance and resume the interruption in a row during the procedure in order to optimize the beneficial effects.
I tried to consider as any option and possible combinations of doctor's contacts and various movements of the skull, which can be used individually or in concert with each other to correct a cranial error. I would also like to point out that isocranial procedures can be used to correct torsion lesions of the midline bones and to close the sutures, which are perceived as open or divided.
A cranial practitioner must use his or her solution in applying isocran methods to correct cranial errors and inconsistencies. Time and practice will enable the user to develop a sense of muscle contraction assistance provided by this procedure and decide whether it is valid for its use. I am confident that doctors who are starting to use these applications will develop many new and innovative ways to admin and change them in order to benefit their patients and improve their results. One of the most significant benefits of the isocran method is the reduction in the time needed to apply the method, as well as the improvement in local pain reduction, as a rule, immediately. The correction lasts longer and the recovery time is reduced.
ISOCRANIAL TECHNIQUE
Coronal suture Isochranial technique: morphology:
The coronal suture extends from the right to the left greater wing of the splenoid and is formed by the union of the frontal bone and the right and left parietal bones. This is a complex suture that connects to the parietal bones with serrated oblique surfaces and pin sleeves. In the superior most aspects of the suture, near the bregma, the frontal bone overlaps the parietal bones. In the lower third of the parietal bones overlap the frontal bone. The middle third of the coronary suture is transitional, where the frontal and parietal bones are alternating overlapping and blocking teeth. The purpose of the release of the coronary suture is the healing of pain along the rough edges, marked with palpation and a history of patients with anterior cranial pain. Optimistically, the release of the frontal bone from the daily restrictions with the parietal joints will facilitate intracranial pressure in the anterior fool and improve the circulation of the cerebrospinal fluid around the frontal lobes. In addition to reducing pain along the coronary suture fields, there have been patient reports of improved drainage of the sinuses, relief of headaches in the frontal area and improvement of mental function in patients complaining of confusion and loss of concentration after anterior head injury.
This method includes specific contact contacts along the frontal and parietal bones used by the doctor. After the specific contacts are made, the patient is guided by respiratory diseases (intervention and exhalation) and specific movements to assist the practitioner in releasing the cranial restrictions. The patient's directional movements include right and left rotation, right and left lateral flexion, flexion and stretching. The doctor's contacts are located at strategic points to help the patient move in one direction while moving in the opposite direction. Using the muscles of the cervical spine to aid in correction or cranial articular lesions, the effectiveness of the method is greatly increased, pain is relieved along the suture fields, and the positive effects of intracranial adjustment will be tested by the patient during the next hours and days following the procedure. The training manual on isocranial technology is available through the International Research Society Sacro Occipital International (SORSI) www.sorsi.com or 1-888-245-1011.1 1-888-245-1011.
