Hair is such an animated subject, and human nature is human nature, what we want, what we cannot have and what we don't want! Curly hair, and we need straight straight hair, and we want curly, brunettes, and we want blonde, blonde, and we want red. In the same way, the hair of the upper lip on the female, as valuable as a sign of exquisite beauty in some parts of the world, is overshadowed by our Western society.
Unwanted hair is a common problem that affects most women to varying degrees due to their life and encourages the use of various temporary hair reduction methods or hair control systems. This causes great difficulties, and it is often accompanied by feelings of poor self-esteem, a sense of isolation and low self-esteem.
Since bearded ladies at Victorian fairs have been shown for amusement and ridicule, Western society has stigmatized the hair. Many women face tremendous length to remove traces of hair from any part of their body, as they find it unattractive and unappealing. However, it’s not just women who are affected. Increasingly, the male sex is under pressure from "the world of celebrities and unwanted hair can be just as offended by the male population at the present time as the woman.
Various hair removal methods
Excessive hair growth can be caused by many factors, such as hormone imbalance (during puberty, pregnancy and menopause), genetics and ethnicity, hereditary, medical or local stimulation, such as waxing or tweezers. Therefore, electrolysis - the only permanent method of hair removal - is treatment, which is in great demand among women and transsexuals, and recently, due to the attitude of society, the number of male clients is growing.
To meet this need, as always, there have been many hair removal measures, some of which are back in history. Hair removal occurs from the time of the caveman, but it is interesting that the parts of the body from which we remove hair have different ages. Removing hair from the head and face was originally not for the purpose of fuss, but for survival. There is evidence that the cavemen did this, but also the ancient Egyptians, and this was done, we believe, for protection, as dropping beards and hair on the head would take away the advantage of the enemy, having everything that could be grabbed, less ticks!
Body hair removal is important in ancient Egypt, Greece and the Middle East. In fact, these women removed most of their body hair, except eyebrows. Egyptian women removed their heads, and pubic hair was considered uncivilized by both sexes! For men, it was also considered uncivilized to have facial hair. Facial hair was a sign of a slave or servant, or of a lower class. The ancient Egyptians used the shape of a razor made of flint or bronze, because the razor was not invented by the French barber Jean Jacques Perret.
They also used a method of temporary hair removal, called sugary. A sticky paste was applied to the skin (sometimes beeswax was used), a strip of fabric was pressed onto the wax and pulled off - the equivalent of waxing today. Rich women of the Roman Empire would remove their body hair with pumice, razors, tweaks and pastes. There was also another method used called threading, which recently saw a surge in popularity. A thin thread or yarn was placed through the fingers of both hands and quickly stroked the area. This repetitive process captured hair and effectively tweezers, tore or catch unwanted hair. In Elizabethan times, the fashion of hair removal (not legs, armpits or pubic hair), their eyebrows and hair from their foreheads, to give the appearance of a longer forehead and forehead, was fashionable. He begins to notice the obvious influence of fashion. plays with hair removal from the start.
Waxing, saccharification, depilatory creams, bleaching, shaving, saccharifying, plucking, tapping and even battery-operated tweezers with several forceps are all temporary methods that many people are trying to try today. In fact, new hair removal devices look like buses - every 20 minutes or so! However, the technology has advanced and with it, it seems that there are some limited and questionable methods of hair removal. X-ray and photodynamic methods are in a limited category, since the former was banned in some countries, such as the United States, and the latter only in the experimental stages. Electric tweezers, transdermal electrolysis and microwaves are some of the questionable methods, since there is no established evidence of their effectiveness.
Electrolysis is still the only proven permanent hair removal method, and many women and many men enjoy this challenge and trust. It often happens that electrologists have the privilege of witnessing a dramatic transformation in their clients, from a shy, closed personality at the beginning of a course of treatment, to a confident and happy person when treatment continues and the results become obvious.
Regardless of your opinion about hair, there is a multi-million dollar industry in our Western society. Such a huge money-making machine, although it will have more than its fair share of delusions, misunderstandings, myths and legends, none of which are related to the truth of true reality. The huge profit caused by the hair removal industry has its share of charlatans and fraudsters, all of which are associated with huge profits.
Hair removal methods are permanent and temporary. English definition of the dictionary & # 39; states: eternal, eternal. With this in mind, there is only one system on the market today that can completely prove hair removal, mainly due to its durability, customer testimony and satisfaction, and this is electrolysis. Invented in 1875, electrolysis offers permanent hair removal for all hair types and colors, as well as all skin types and colors. It is still used in hospitals by surgeons and ophthalmologists for trichaeis and other eyelash distortions, and it also supports the departments of laser hair removal in hospitals. It is also considered an important tool in the work of veterinarians for animals (primarily horses and dogs) for the permanent removal of distorted and growing eyelashes. It provides cosmetic relief for the consumer with mild acute problems for a patient with serious problems and for a transgender patient who may need many hours of treatment.
Confusing messages have always emerged from regulators about the definitions of the words “permanently” being deleted. or "reduction" in the area of hair removal actually means. It has been agreed that if the removed hair does not grow within one year after the last treatment, a permanent reduction can be declared. Electrolysis, invented in 1875, still remains, one of the methods is legally allowed for permanent removal.
New technologies, such as LASER (Light Amplification Stimulated Emission of Radiation) and IPL (Intense Pulse Light), were initially launched as competitors for electrolysis and were initially sold as a response to all permanent hair removal. This, at the present time, is realized, at best, a few nave and at worst, of course, is misleading. The reality is that it was wishful thinking, and now it is much more realistic. The truth is that, although they have their own successes, they also have their limitations - they cannot successfully process all colors and types of hair and all skin colors, and now they accept their limitations and embrace electrolysis and electrologists as their reserve.
Laser and IPL are permitted by the FDA to require a permanent reduction but not permanent removal. hair. The truth is that this newer technology is shiny for large areas and for dark hair. For gray or white hair it just does not work. The laser and IPL aim melanin in the hair, and if the hair is gray or white, there is no melanin in the hair so that it can be applied. In addition, for some unknown reason (s), not all hairs respond to treatment, and results range from 85% to 95% success. The remaining 5% - 15% of hair will be deprived of melanin (which appears white), but still stubbornly continues to grow. This leaves the only possibility of permanent hair removal. up to additional electrolysis treatment to complete the work. Laser and IPL are now recognized as manageable hair. system and customers are informed that reproduction may occur.
The light energy of the photoepilator was launched in 1969 and was developed based on studies of laser hair removal. Photoepilators use a filtered flash of light developed on one hair at a time. After focusing the light, the hair is clamped. Like any laser and light instrument, the light used in the device targets the blood and melanin pigments in the hair and heats them. To enable this process, fiber optic probes were inserted into the hair follicle through which the light flashed. So far, no clinical data have been published confirming any claims of consistency, and there is no evidence of its effectiveness.
The method of tweezers with its unfounded assertion of permanent hair removal was first patented in 1959. This system works by passing electric current through tweezers, which keeps the hair on the surface of the skin, grabbing them for a few minutes. Electricity penetrates the hair to the root and requires permanent damage. The scientific community has reservations, because the requirement of electricity, which destroys the root of the hair, does not have a scientific backup.
Percutaneous and transdermal offers permanent hair removal. but so far no clinical data have been published to establish the requirement that permanent hair removal is possible using these methods. In 1985, when the use of AC electric tweezers was discontinued, manufacturers made some changes to the device. Adhesive patches were introduced instead of cotton swabs, and the name turned into percutaneous hair removal. He uses the idea of direct current (DC) for percutaneous drug delivery (iontophoresis) without using a needle. A direct current current is passed through a conductive gel on the skin surface through an adhesive patch placed on the skin. The root of the hair is believed to be permanently damaged by an electric current that moves down to the hair follicle.
To date, there are no clinical data, and the laws of physics do not support the requirements of manufacturers. Hair does not conduct electricity, but skin does. As electricity passes through a medium of poor resistance, it will spread over the surface of the skin, rather than pass through the hair. Therefore, as in the case of the pincer method, the argument that it reaches the root of the hair to destroy it does not have a scientific reserve.
Ultrasonic hair removal claims that the ultrasonic waves are directed exactly down through the hair, and in the process they are converted into thermal energy, which super super heats the hair growth areas and slows growth. It is argued that the waves are attached to the hair shaft and do not disperse any side effects into the skin pregnancy.
Ultrasonic hair removal offers complete hair removal. and claims that he is the next generation of hair removal devices for a long time. In its marketing material it says that it is a hair removal solution. and that there is no additional hair in the same follicle, provided it is a long-term treatment. The FDA has not yielded results to date regarding the sale request in April 2010 on the latest device.
Microwave permanent hair removal is one of the most unusual methods of permanent hair, and its safety and effectiveness has not been proven scientifically. Microwave devices work the same way as in microwave ovens. Microwaves are radio waves with a short frequency range. One of the characteristics of microwaves is its ability to be absorbed by water, fats and sugar. After absorption, these waves cause the molecules in the absorbed element to vibrate, which leads to the release of heat. Thus, the skin is heated, and theoretically, thermal energy causes the destruction of hair-forming cells. However, the indiscriminate nature of microwaves heating is its biggest drawback and is the reason for its limited use.
Some oral medications are effective in slowing hair growth. Spironolactone, finasteride, flutamide, and cyproterone acetate are some drugs commonly used to stop hair growth. The main disadvantage of this is the side effects that these drugs have on the human body. Here it is always advisable to use them in consultation with a doctor or a dermatologist. Vaniqa is the only recipe for topical cream that is approved by the FDA. He claims to help in unwanted growth of facial hair with its active ingredient, eflornithine hydrochloride, which helps reduce facial hair growth. Predominant hair growth creates an enzyme that inhibits cell proliferation and other cell functions. Reports show that there are some improvements, but only while the drug is being taken.
Thus, to summarize hair removal and hair reduction, this is an animated object, and it is easy to seduce a new generation of devices, sexual images and clever technical jargon transmitted by white coats. Each person is different, and we have our own personal requirements, temporary or permanent, maybe a mixture of both? Explore and select the method (s) that is right for you, but if you want permanent hair removal guaranteed. The only method that has been proven is electrolysis.
